Stay tuned with CashEssentials news ! - beyond payments
By subscribing, you accept our Privacy Policy.

About ‘The Macroeconomics of De-Cashing’ 1/2

Categories : Uncategorized
April 17, 2017
Tags : Cash substitution, Tax evasion, Usage, User-friendly
“Cash has been created as the historically most convenient form of money, and carrying cash in the wallet is often perceived as a fundamental human right.” writes Alexei Kireyev.
Guillaume Lepecq

The International Monetary Fund has published a working paper entitled The Macroeconomics of De-Cashing by Alexei Kireyev, which presents a framework for the economic implications of de-cashing, defined as replacing paper currency with convertible deposits. The paper draws a balance on possible positive and negative macroeconomic implications of de-cashing, and proposes policies capable of augmenting its economic and social benefits, while reducing potential costs.

The IMF writes that working papers are published to elicit comments and encourage debate. Here are my thoughts.

The second section of the paper reviews cash usage and recognizes its leading role as a payment instrument and a store of value. It also underlines that “Cash has been created as the historically most convenient form of money, and carrying cash in the wallet is often perceived as a fundamental human right.”

I concur.

The third section analyses the economics of cash and money. Here, the author compares cash and transferrable deposits, i.e. money held on deposit accounts at a commercial bank. The author writes “currency and transferable deposits are very similar and both meet the definition of broad money” even though he recognizes some differences: “First, currency can become technically obsolete. Banknotes fade and break, and the efforts to remedy the problem with plastics is of little help and involve unneeded costs. Transferrable deposits do not have this problem. Second, payments with currency are anonymous, which makes them a popular vehicle for abuse, tax avoidance, terrorism financing, and money laundering. Transferable deposits are personified and generally cannot be used for these purposes. Third, currency is prone to counterfeiting, at times on a large scale.”

I disagree.

Currency and transferable deposits are very different animals. The easiest way to demonstrate this is that according to the World Bank, over 2 billion adults do not hold a bank account. On the other hand, there are approximately 600 billion banknotes in circulation worldwide and cash is perhaps the only product in the world which has achieved a market penetration rate close to 100%. The most commonly cited barrier to opening a bank account is lack of funds. Other reasons include living in an underserved rural area, the inability to prove one’s identity, or a lack of financial literacy. Worldwide, over 200 million micro, small and medium-sized businesses also lack access to basic bank accounts and adequate financing.

Currency is not technically obsolete. On the contrary. Banknotes and coins incorporate state-of-the-art technology not only to stay ahead of counterfeiters but also to improve their durability.  The number or euro counterfeits declined by 24% in 2016. 684,000 notes were withdrawn from circulation in 2016, for a total of over 19 billion notes in circulation. This represents a value of € 44 million. Meanwhile, card fraud totalled $21.84 billion globally in 2015, a 20.6% increase over 2014. Oddly, 2016 figures for card fraud are not available.

Is cash a popular vehicle for abuse, tax avoidance, terrorism financing, and money laundering ? This argument is frequently used by those who support the elimination or the reduction of cash usage but there is little evidence to substantiate this.  According to the report Cash, freedom and crime – Use and impact of cash in a world going digital published by Deutsche Bank Research,  the share of cash in payments does not reflect the size of the shadow economy. Germany and Austria are cash-intensive economies with small shadow economies, while Sweden is a low-cash country with a relatively high shadow economy.

DB Blog

Meanwhile, the Guardian reports that British authorities are investigating a vast international money-laundering scheme dubbed the ‘Laundromat’  which involves the transfer of billions of dollars from Russia into Europe, the US and other countries. So far, $20 billion have been tracked down but the real total may be as high as $80 billion. Many of the world’s largest banks have been involved in the transactions.  In another case, Crédit Suisse were surprised by a tax evasion and money laundering investigation spanning five countries and potentially involving thousands of account holders.


To be continued…