Stay tuned with CashEssentials news ! - beyond payments
By subscribing, you accept our Privacy Policy.
×
×

Update on the Global Demand for Banknotes

Categories : Cash has legal tender status, Cash is a contingency and fall-back solution, Cash is a symbol of national sovereignty, Cash is also a store of value, Cash is the most widely used payment instrument
November 17, 2025
Tags : Cash demand, Cash in circulation, Cash substitution, Coins
Global banknote demand is rebounding post-pandemic, returning to pre-2020 trends. The introduction of new high-denomination notes has slowed, yet cash remains vital as a store of value. Cash infrastructure must adapt to declining transactional use and rising precautionary demand.
Antti Heinonen
External advisor, Bank of Finland, former Director, Banknotes of the ECB, Member of the CashEssentials Steering Committee

This update will start with an analysis of the development of banknote circulation in value terms during recent years, followed by that in volume terms. Besides developments during last few years also indicators since 2013 are examined. In addition, we will continue the analysis published in September the the use of coins vs. durable note substrates in replacing low-end paper notes. It was concluded then, that the note/coin boundary is not changing as often as in the past, because durable note substrates are increasingly used to replace low-end paper notes instead of new high-end coins. In this article the focus is shifted from the low to the high end of the currency structure and the impact of digital payments on the introduction of new high-end notes is analysed.

Banknote circulation in value terms

Using statistics and various publications available on central bank websites, a slightly varying number (between 143 and 145) of currencies have been addressed in the following chart, related to the growth rates by value of banknotes in circulation in years 2021−2024. The figures refer to the end of the calendar year, even in cases where the financial year of the respective central bank is not the calendar year. However, in the case of three currencies the figures refer to an earlier month of the year because the corresponding central banks haven’t yet published the figures at the end of 2024.

Figure 1: Annual growth rates by value of banknotes in circulation in 20212024 (143145 currencies)

It is not easy to draw any conclusion based on Fig. 1. When comparing the development in 2024 to that in the other three years the best guess is that the bars in 2024 are closest to those in 2021. The distribution in 2021 indicated a return to normality after the Covid 19- pandemic, and the higher-than-normal cash balances accumulated during the pandemic were not yet abandoned. The public’s behaviour changed in this respect first in 2022, when the growing opportunity cost motivated the public to reduce their cash balances. This is indicated in Fig.1 by the high number of negative growth rates in 2022 and 2023.

Whether there was a kind of return to normality in 2024 is further studied in Figure 2. It illustrates the annual median growth rate of the value of banknotes in circulation in 2013−2024.

 

Update on the Global Demand for Banknotes

Figure 2 Median growth rate of the value of banknotes in circulation in 20132024 (143145 currencies)

Based on Fig. 2, the median growth rate is indeed returning to the earlier slightly decreasing trend which was thrown into disarray during the pandemic and its aftermath. This is the conclusion regarding the growth of the value of notes in circulation. Next developments of the volume growth will be addressed.

Banknote circulation in volume terms

Even though most studies related to the banknote circulation analyse its development in value terms, the volume developments are much more important to the industry and stakeholders of the cash cycle.

The pandemic accelerated the change of payment habits towards digital payments and simultaneously the growing uncertainty increased the precautionary and store of value demand for banknotes. This was mirrored in the demand for high denomination notes. Therefore, the growth of the volume demand for banknotes has been lower than that of the value.

The denominational data on banknote circulation has regrettably less coverage on central bank websites than its total value. Therefore, those central banks which don’t publish the denominational data are encouraged to do so. The global updates would be then more representative.

Anyway, thanks to several central bank colleagues, who generously provide data for these global updates, the publicly available data has been complemented with several additional currencies. Accordingly, the annual growth rates of the number of banknotes in circulation were available in 2024 for 104 currencies. Figure 3 addresses the distributions of the growth rates by the number of banknotes in circulation in years 2021−2024.

Some figures refer to end of the financial year, not to the end of the calendar year. The reason is that the respective central banks publish the volume figures only at the end of their financial year.

Update on the Global Demand for Banknotes

 Figure 3: Annual growth rate by the number of banknotes in circulation of 104 currencies in 20212024.

It is difficult to draw any firm conclusions on the direction of the volume development. It seems, however, again that the distribution in 2024 is closer to that in 2021 than those in 2022 and 2023.This assumption is further analysed in Figure 4 which illustrates the share of currencies with a positive growth rate in the years 2013−2024.

Update on the Global Demand for Banknotes

Figure 4. Per cent of currencies which had a positive growth rate by the number of banknotes in circulation in 2013−2024, on average 111 currencies

Similarly, as Fig. 3 also Fig. 4 indicates that the growth rate of the number of banknotes in circulation has bent towards the earlier trend. In years before the pandemic the number of currencies having a positive growth rate in volume terms was more than 80%, and in 2024 clearly so.

Impact of the use of other payments methods on the introduction of new high-end notes

Historically, most issuing authorities regularly made inflation corrections to the currency structure. New higher denomination notes were introduced, and simultaneously low-end notes were replaced with coins. In the September analysis, it was concluded that this is only partly true regarding the low end.

During the last couple of decades an increasing number of digital payment methods has been developed. Hence, it is interesting to study what kind of impact these new payment methods have had on the introduction of new high-end notes.

The impacts will be first studied using latest available statistics and classifying the currencies based on the date of introduction of the current high-end note denomination. The results are depicted in Figure 5. Each bar describes the number of new high-end denominations introduced during various 10-year periods.

Update on the Global Demand for Banknotes

Figure 5. Periods of introduction of high-end notes of various currencies (149 currencies).

According to Fig. 5, roughly the same amount of the currently circulating high-end note denominations, around 35, were introduced during each of the last three 10-year periods. Another interesting observation is that the highest denomination of four currencies hasn’t changed since 1955. In Norway the 1,000-krone note has been the high-end denomination since 1877 and 1,000 francs respectively in Switzerland since 1907. The high-end denomination of Japanese yen is a bit younger. 10,000 yen was introduced in 1958.

Evidently, the purchasing power of these notes has decreased significantly during the years, but in all three cases the denominations are still in line with that of high-end denominations of other currencies and adequate for the store of value function of banknotes. 1000 NOK is around 100 USD, 1000 CHF is in its own category among major currencies and worth more than EUR 1,000, and JPY 10,000 is around GBP 50.

Fig.5 gives the impression that the introduction of new high-end denominations has slowed down because their number during the last decade is a bit lower than during the earlier ten-year period. To get a more precise understanding of the development, another vantage point is selected. The year 1999 has been selected as an alternative date, because the acceleration of new payment innovations has really taken place only during the last couple of decades. A similar chart as in Fig. 5 is presented having 1999 as the vantage point.

 

Figure 6. Decades of introduction of existing high-end banknotes in 1999 (168 currencies)[1].

Fig. 6 gives remarkably different impression from Fig. 5. This is the case even if one takes into account the collapse of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia and the post-collapse transitions in many countries in the 1990’s.

According to Fig. 6, a new high-end denomination was introduced by close to 100 currencies during the 1990’s, while there were still very few instant payment alternatives to cash for high-value payments. Hence, even if the world inflation was decreasing in 1990’s from the double-digit figures of 1980’s, the mindset of issuing authorities hadn’t changed. They still saw the need to issue new high-end notes, as reflected in Fig. 6.

An additional explanation for the large number of new high-end notes was probably the frequent upgrading of the whole banknote series. It was another feature typical in the 1990’s because of the continuous developments in the digital reproduction technology. In the context of a new series, the question whether to change the currency structure was usually topical. Recently, the average life of a banknote series has increased , and the consideration of currency structure has become less frequent.

Based on Figures 5 and 6 the introduction of new high-end notes has significantly slowed down. That raises the question, in which scope high-end denominations have been withdrawn from circulation because of introduction of new payment methods. There are some historical examples, e.g. the Bank of England issued still during World War II denominations up to 1,000 pounds and the United States hasn’t issued 500−10,000-dollar notes since 1969. It is also well-known that the €500 hasn’t been issued since April 2019 and was not included in the current Europa series of euro notes. Also, the Danish 1,000-krone note will not be part of the new note series scheduled for 2028−29, and the last day of the current 1,000-krone banknote as a valid means of payment was 31 May 2025 .

Other recent examples relevant to the question are the following: The Riksbank withdraw 10,000-krona note in 1991, Bank Negara Malaysia demonetized RM500 and RM1,000 notes in July 1999, Bank of Canada withdraw the 1,000-dollar note in 2000 and the Reserve Bank of India demonetised ₹ 1,000 in November 2016 and issued ₹2,000 banknotes in exchange. The latter lost legal tender status in September 2023. Moreover, the National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia withdraw the 5,000 denar note in December 2016 and the Autoriti Monetari Brunei Darussalam the BND 10,000 note in November 2020. Also, in Israel various sources have raised the cancellation of the highest denomination, 200 shekel note, but the Governor of the Bank of Israel has strongly denied any justification for that.

Based on these less than 10 examples during the last 30+ years, the availability of new payment methods for high-value transactions hasn’t been reflected to a great extent in the withdrawal of existing high-end denominations.

One may ask what these developments mean for the cash industry? If the arguments are valid and related to the increasing use of other payment instruments for high-value transactions and the high-end note is sufficient for the store of value function of cash, they are justified. However, if the arguments are related to money laundering or other misuses, they should be set in proportion to the digital payment fraud.

Concluding remarks

This year’s update of the global demand for banknotes gives a more positive impression of the development than the two preceding annual updates. Both the value and volume growth has bent towards the trends existing before the Covid-19 pandemic.

Impacts on the currency structure are another interesting trend. Both the note/coin boundary and the high-end note are not changing as often as they used to do in 1990’s.

However, these end-of-year assessments provide only a partial picture of the situation. They don’t tell anything about the flow variables, like production, processing, transport or destruction of notes . The impacts of decreasing volumes on the cash cycle are already seen in a few countries and put pressure on the maintenance of the cash infrastructure. The key challenge regarding the future role of cash, is the opposite development trends of the two motives to use cash: its demand for transactions on the one hand and as a store of value or for precautionary reasons on the other. Therefore, central banks need a serious plan for the maintenance and development of the cash infrastructure, which is vital for a well-functioning society.

[1] Introduction of euro notes explains the difference in the number of currencies included in Fig. 5 and 6.

Related