Stay tuned with CashEssentials news ! - beyond payments
By subscribing, you accept our Privacy Policy.

Freedom of choice, or the multiplication of payment tools

Categories : Cash is a public good, Cash is trust, Cash protects privacy and anonymity
November 20, 2017
Tags : Public good, Social cohesion, Social Inclusion, United Kingdom
As use of electronic money grows, so does the use of hard cash - but the next step could come from an unexpected player, states Deloitte Chief Economist Ian Stewart.
Communication Team / Equipo de Comunicación

Even though electronic money is gaining ground across the globe (see The New York Time’s graph here below) this is not – as one might believe – particularly affecting cash usage. Indeed, as the use of mobile and contactless payments continues to rise, so does the use of cash. According to Deloitte’s Chief Economist in the UK, Ian Stewart, despite all the hype linked to Bitcoin and others, there could be another, more “established” player that could join the pool of digital payment options: the central bank via an all-digital currency.


As Stewart rightly states, “practical problems [also] stand in the way of bitcoin becoming a digital currency. Wide fluctuations in its value mean that it does not meet one of the definitions of an effective currency – that it offers a stable store of value”. This is a crucial point for any currency – be it virtual or physical – and it could become the key argument for the development of an all-digital currency by central banks.

Such a development would allow governments to maintain control on a country’s monetary policy, without the risk of it slowly being taken over by private actors such as Apple, Google, or any other non-governmental player that is participating in today’s electronic payments race.

What could be the positive aspects of an all-digital central bank-issued currency? Maintaining consumer confidence in a country’s legal tender as well as keeping the grip on monetary policy. And what about the downsides? Stewart lists them as being linked to what currently makes Bitcoin attractive to some users: the loss of anonymity that is associated to cash or Bitcoin usage. Indeed, it is highly unlikely that a government-issued digital currency would preserve cash’s central attributes: privacy and anonymity. Because governments generally criticise cash as a tool often used by criminals and tax evaders, it is more likely that they will seek to make the digital currency into something that can be easily traced – a likely cause for consumer opposition and fuel for the “big brother” argument.

Another important advantage, from the government’s perspective, is that “an all-digital currency would also enable a central bank to set interest rates below zero – enabling the bank to penalize holders of money in order to stimulate spending […] in a world of very low interest rates, digital cash would help restore the power of monetary policy,” writes Stewart.

Nevertheless, it is still too soon to panic as “2.7 million people in the UK, 5% of adults, spread relatively evenly across all age groups, rely almost entirely on cash to make their day-to-day payments. It is an important budgeting tool.” And regardless of the multiplication of alternative payment methods, cash usage is growing between 5%-10% each year, worldwide.

To read the original article, click here.

To view the New York Times’ statistics on noncash payments worldwide [paywall], please click here.